October 16, 2021

guruproofreading

Discover your best

Telehealth addiction treatment rose rapidly during pandemic; but potential benefits still unclear — ScienceDaily

During the COVID-19 pandemic, dependancy therapy providers promptly pivoted to providing solutions through telehealth. New research highlights the opportunity for telehealth supply to increase individual engagement by enhancing obtain and comfort. Having said that, it also finds limited evidence that telehealth final results in greater retention or other results relative to in-man or woman treatment. The study appears on line today in Psychiatric Expert services a journal of the American Psychiatric Association, ahead of the organization’s Mental Health and fitness Providers Meeting.

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, only about 27% of specialty dependancy amenities experienced telehealth abilities and telehealth was applied in about .1% of dependancy remedy visits. Addiction treatment providers confronted many constraints on telehealth use. During the pandemic, state and federal companies quickly eased numerous of the restrictions to keep entry to procedure and use of telehealth expanded promptly. Policymakers are now considering which of these alterations to continue to keep.

Researchers from RTI International and UCLA — University of California, Los Angeles reviewed research of the efficacy of synchronous supply of telehealth dependancy cure relative to in-man or woman procedure. Eight printed studies have been identified that as opposed dependancy procedure by means of telehealth with in-individual treatment method. Most of the scientific tests were compact (N < 150 patients). Seven found telehealth treatment as effective but not more effective in terms of retention, satisfaction with treatment, therapeutic alliance and substance use. One large Canadian study found better retention with telehealth methadone medication management.

The researchers also conducted an online survey of addiction treatment organizations in California and held interviews with addiction professionals and other stakeholders. Addiction professionals were most comfortable with using telehealth for one-to-one counseling. Survey respondents were almost equally split with about 46% saying telehealth individual counseling was equally or more effective than in-person and 45% saying telehealth was less effective. When considering use of telehealth for intake assessment, 40% said telehealth was equally or more effective while 49% said it was less effective. Telehealth group counseling had less support with 25% reporting it was equally or more effective than in person and 62% reporting it was less effective than in person.

Interview participants highlighted that telehealth reduces the time and cost to patients of participating in treatment and offers an opportunity for clinicians to observe patients’ home environment and engage patients’ families. On the other hand, many participants felt strongly that patients with substance use disorders need personal relationships and connectedness which are hard to establish virtually. Additionally, they noted that it is more difficult to sense how a patient is doing when meeting via telehealth and it can be challenging to keep patients focused online. Interviewees also noted that telehealth may work better for some patients and for some clinicians than for others.

“Telehealth health may allow patients to more easily begin and stay in addiction treatment, which has been a longstanding challenge,” said Tami L. Mark, Ph.D., M.B.A., lead author on the paper. “However, research is needed to confirm this benefit. As providers pivot to hybrid telehealth models — offering both telehealth and in-person treatment — they need information to help target telehealth to the most appropriate services and patients.”

“This research underscores the importance of offering telehealth for addiction treatment and the dramatic need to conduct more empirical work to test out the concerns regarding telehealth articulated by agency staff and on surveys,” said Lisa Dixon, M.D., M.P.H., editor, Psychiatric Services.

Mark is senior fellow, Behavioral Health Financing and Quality Measurement at RTI International, an independent nonprofit research institute dedicated to improving the human condition. The study’s coauthors include Katherine Treiman, Ph.D., M.P.H., Howard Padwa, Ph.D., Kristen Henretty, M.A., Janice Tzeng, M.P.H., and Marylou Gilbert, M.A., J.D.

Story Source:

Materials provided by American Psychiatric Association. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.